Right after Ellimist Chronicles, #54, and #8, this was easily my favourite book in the series... and it also did the most of all the books to creep the everlovingheck outta' me.
SPOILER, woop.
So they go back in time to kill the bad guy by preventing his birth, right?
Wrong. They kill his HOST. Not the villain, the villain's host.
Doesn't this mean that logically, except for the part about Shakespeareian annoyances, the story would still have happened approximately the same way, with another host? And on top of that, a perfectly innocent human being was prevented from ever living, and who KNOWS how that could've altered history!?
I don't know about you, but that prospect is more than a bit chilling to me.
Feel free in this thread to discuss this and any other logical eff-ups in this book.