idk. I like the being of book six. Jake is very away that the yeerk in his bro is a living, breathing thing. And he wants to make it stop breathing...
The idea of killing an innocent host whilst attacking controllers is probably the most disturbing aspect of this series.
probably
A couple others that at times disrubed me, but never really got much in way of characters addressing it:
Slavery in general I think gets a good crisis of moral in the series- not enough to justify it, I think-but the justification of a superior race giving an inferior one utility, was fertile if un-tiled ground throughout
Not to far off, motives of voluntary controllers: the chapmans had some moral justifications, taylor and people like her, I would think have a few dilemmas
And for me at least, nothlitism was ethically grey. The solution at the end, but really things like Tobias's use of it (41 especially) where do you get the idea to up and leave your life in that way, like that's a fine way to resolve your problems.
Seems like running away. Bugged me
And as I'm just rambling now, the thread started with do they get more sensitive to their actions: yes to their enemies, no to their friends.
By the end of the series it feels like they are much more willing to risk someone, to jeopardize their personal relationships to get the job done. It's pratical, and for it's purpose good, but still, ask Jake in book 1 if he'd done what he did in 53 to Rachel or the Auxs. Doubt it. Seem the transition wasn't emphasised more