Well, judging from our own limited and extremely primitive spaceships (
), it would seem that a craft that can attain great speeds in the near-vacuum of space would not have the same abilities in the atmosphere, due to the great force needed to get the damn thing off the ground and into orbit. But we do know that craft such as the Concord (you shall be missed!) have the ability to maneuver well enough in atmosphere, while also reaching altitudes nearing very low orbit, and at great speed (at least for Earth craft).
So, my point is, I don't think it's inconceivable that someday we'll reach a point where we'll have craft that can function well enough in atmosphere and in space, without sacrificing maneuverability. Think about making a fighter jet that has the propulsive power to jet into space, as well. I don't see why there would be much of a difference, but then again, damnit man I'm a paleontologist, not a physicist!
As for lasers, a light laser wouldn't be visible as a beam in space because there is nothing for the light to bounce off of, as there is in the air with particulates and dust and all that.
Now as to whether lasers can be weapons in space technology, who knows what powered the lasers in Animorphs? Crystals? Chemicals? Particle beams? Here's an interesting How Stuff Works article that explains in detail some of the lasers that are being developed both for warfare and communication.
http://science.howstuffworks.com/space-war2.htmKinda scary, no?
But if some source can focus a beam of energy so that it has destructive power, then it shouldn't react differently in atmosphere versus in space--and it probably wouldn't be just a simple light laser.