Unrealistic *Spoiler*

[Kotetsu1442]

I agree, no deaths till the end was unrealistic, but I think that if someone died halfway, then that may make the series even more unrealistic than it already was.  Because, all of them are needed at the end.  So maybe it would be better with a death, but then the odds would be even less in their favor.

True, but like we discussed before, there were certainly ways KA could have changed the situation from the beginning or set up characters to die early; but as I've noted it may have been a few too many books into the series before KA was fully aware of how far the series was going to go so in all fairness she wouldn't have had reason to have prepared for this until too late.

[Tim Bruening]

i've argued the same point many times.
if k.a. wanted accuracy (war has sacrifices), she could have gotten rid of a few during the middle. *cough* cassie *cough*
keeping them ALL alive against impossible odds (only to have 1+ killed at the very end) doesn't seem fair, one way or the other.

it wasn't my series, but it still didn't feel 'right'.

try and keep the title a bit more specific (but thanks for including the spoiler warning!)

What do you have against Cassie?

[Chad32]

That's a big can of worms you're trying to open, asking why some people dislike Cassie. She's practically a base breaker.

[Tim Bruening]

That's a big can of worms you're trying to open, asking why some people dislike Cassie. She's practically a base breaker.

I like Cassie (I think she is pretty).