Richard's Animorphs Forum

Animorphs Section => Animorphs Forum Classic => Topic started by: Green armadillo ette on May 30, 2010, 09:08:34 PM

Title: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Green armadillo ette on May 30, 2010, 09:08:34 PM
Vote and give your opinion.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Chad32 on May 30, 2010, 09:10:51 PM
I don't remember her well, so I'm not sure. She was in book 28, right?
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Green armadillo ette on May 30, 2010, 09:31:23 PM
 she was in the arrival #38
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Terenia on May 30, 2010, 09:35:56 PM
It's super sad that I saw that and thought of Kat and was really confused as to why a thread had been made about her.....


I think she was a good character. She had some Mary Sue-like qualities, but her genius was not only her asset, it was her downfall. She also suffered from a pretty healthy dose of cowardice. These things, I think, took away her Sueness.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: estrid on May 31, 2010, 05:02:52 AM
It's super sad that I saw that and thought of Kat and was really confused as to why a thread had been made about her.....

why WOULDN'T a thread be made about me? i am pretty awesome 8)

lol seriously thought, i thought she was well written for the most part. However, it really bothered me how at the end even tho she was being used by the higher up andalites, when she found out, she still sided w/the andalites who were using her. what was the point of making this genius character that is so impressionable? it would have been better had she realized the severity of what she was doing.

I don't know, im babbling and its 3 am. i hope that at least makes some sense :-\
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: AniDragon on June 01, 2010, 07:14:36 PM
I think she was a good character. She had some Mary Sue-like qualities, but her genius was not only her asset, it was her downfall. She also suffered from a pretty healthy dose of cowardice. These things, I think, took away her Sueness.

Pretty much that.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: aareavis on June 07, 2010, 01:08:53 AM
It's super sad that I saw that and thought of Kat and was really confused as to why a thread had been made about her.....

why WOULDN'T a thread be made about me? i am pretty awesome 8)

lol seriously thought, i thought she was well written for the most part. However, it really bothered me how at the end even tho she was being used by the higher up andalites, when she found out, she still sided w/the andalites who were using her. what was the point of making this genius character that is so impressionable? it would have been better had she realized the severity of what she was doing.

I don't know, im babbling and its 3 am. i hope that at least makes some sense :-\
It kind of makes sense to me actually.  A lot of times, prodigies are sheltered from the world when they are young.  Therefore, they don't develop certain social skills that tell them that not everyone can be trusted.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: estrid on June 07, 2010, 02:10:15 AM
good to know at least someone gets my late night babbling :P

that's actually a good point. i never thought of the sheltered aspect.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: EscafilDevice on June 09, 2010, 12:49:56 AM
I think she was a good character. She had some Mary Sue-like qualities, but her genius was not only her asset, it was her downfall. She also suffered from a pretty healthy dose of cowardice. These things, I think, took away her Sueness.

Pretty much that.

^thirded

The only problem with Estrid was that KA never did anything with her after that book.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: goom on June 10, 2010, 02:10:59 AM
It's super sad that I saw that and thought of Kat and was really confused as to why a thread had been made about her.....

me too. reading estrid in the books feels so weird.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: estrid on June 10, 2010, 02:21:44 AM
lol glad to know im so loved, that the real estrid has been forgotten :P i have taken over her role perfectly ;D
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: goom on June 10, 2010, 03:00:27 AM
too true, estrid. too true.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Ferahgo on June 11, 2010, 04:18:00 AM
The only problem with Estrid was that KA never did anything with her after that book.

When I first read the series, I used to think and hope that Ax would eventually go back to his homeworld after the war, marry her, and have lots of little baby Andalites. On a second read-through, I decided that Ax could do much better.

She might be beautiful and brilliant, but she's got a bit of a scummy, cowardly side to her as well.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Terenia on June 11, 2010, 12:17:52 PM
I'd like to hear the opinion of the two people who voted 'Badly Written'. I'd be interested in hearing someone elses perspective. :)
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: clockwork_atom on June 30, 2010, 10:49:08 PM
I actually just reread that book for a fanfiction idea (she's actually really hard to write for).  I agree with advanced people being sheltered thing on her part.  She's naive and thinks that she can change a world that's already too bent on the war effort, which is probably why she went (also the ending wouldn't be quite as romantic too, lmao). 

For some reason I kind of also am reminded of the Daisy character from the Great Gatsby-- I feel like if more time was spent on her background, she might've had a few of the traits: "They were careless people... they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money of their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made."  She had Arbat rep-ing for her, and the way she's naive, sort of reminded me of that I suppose  and her retreat was that wacky sounding science field.  I would like my ffiction to reflect that...

Yeah I don't really see her in the best light, but she's a very interesting character because of it.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Estelore on June 30, 2010, 11:17:58 PM
How to put this so it is clear... ah, right!


I hate her so much that I have no choice but to love her.

Seriously, the character is so absolutely rotten to the core by the end of her brief appearance, and so much development and fleshing-out of her personality and history occurred in so brief a time, so well, that while I absolutely loathed her as a sentient being, I ADORE her as a character. Every time I read her, I send K.A. and Michael and any ghostwriter(s) associated with her story arc a mental kudos for succeeding in writing a character so efficient at making me dislike her.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Seventhsage on July 01, 2010, 11:45:39 AM
I actually like the idea of her, but not the way it turned out.  For one, she is skilled in multiple ways, but insecure.  She really likes tail-fighting, and is really good at it (Ax says so himself near the beginning of the book, when they fight together) and she's an estreen.  On top of that, she's a freaking genius, but without the normal arrogance that most andalites carry around with them.  On the other hand, she's a woman in a man's world.  Everyone she spends time with treats her like a princess except the humans and Ax.  Ax falls for her (understandable, he's been so alone for so long, his brother is dead, and she's one hell of a catch) and she just turns her back on the one living creature that treated her as an equal (the tail fight is something I'm betting the others hadn't done with her) to help do what she thought was right.  (sounds a lot like Cassie, to me).
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: clockwork_atom on July 01, 2010, 12:04:12 PM
The way you say that, she sounds exactly like a mary sue, but somehow she manages to work.  Some mary sues happen to work very well.  But maybe her insecurities and cowardice help to balance that out?  Plus it was told in first person, and a view point who was quite taken by her, so her character might've been skewed slightly.  With first person one should always distrust them.  Without Arbat she was treated like a joke.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Seventhsage on July 01, 2010, 12:09:02 PM
yeah, I'll agree to that, but the fact that she drops Ax in three moves is no skew, he fights with that tail every day and someone who's never even been in the academy (granted, she was trained by a master) takes him down with a textbook three move combo.  It almost makes me angry that she's so wishy-washy, she has no reason to be.  A little of that andalite arrogance could do her some good, since she, unlike 90% of the race, deserves it.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Kotetsu1442 on July 02, 2010, 12:02:37 AM
I think there was enough 'Andalite arrogance' in her psychotic outburst shortly after Ax discovers her labwork. If you overlooked it and need a quick review, it's on page 122, where she gleefully exclaims that her creation isn't just about defeating the Yeerks, but gives the Andalites absolute power to destroy any who oppose the Andalites and all 'enemies of decency and goodness.'

She then is told that she's been going to be killed after the mission to keep the details of the mission secret, which somehow leads her to the conclusion that sacrificing humanity isn't worth it to destroying the Yeerks... wait, how are those thoughts connected? Anyways, she gets wishy-washy over "Go against one of my own, or save the human race" in the Yeerk pool, and in the end decides to stick with her new moral outlook: It isn't worth defeating the enemy if the cost is the human race, because the humans are good and decent... but she never repents of the idea of wiping out everyone who opposes them.

I'm going to vote 'Badly Written' but only because of the "Well, risking other intelligent species is OK if it is necessary to stop the enemy, I'll see the mission through... wait, I'm going to die? Then in that case it isn't worth risking the species." It isn't even cowardly, because she isn't planning on opposing Arbat to save herself, it is that somehow ending the mission by killing her made her realize that wiping out humans is 'foolishly, criminally wrong.' What?

I wouldn't consider her Mary-Sue, because she's got flaws and strengths, but maybe it would have been better if she wasn't a super-talented tail-fighter since it wasn't strictly necessary to gain Ax's respect and admiration and then she really would be just a prodigy, gifted but not Mary-Sue.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: clockwork_atom on July 02, 2010, 12:46:21 AM
Argh.  I have to repost what I said.  It was profound and I can't remember how I fraised it.  *Says many foul sounding words*

Anywho.

I dunno, if your butt was on the line like that, I think you would rethink a lot of things as well.  Things would suddenly seem so crystal clear when being at the other end of a barrel.  About 90% of sentient beings wouldn't die like that because life is a once in a... well lifetime thing.  And you want to keep it for as long as possible.  She was a slap in the face to the reader (and Ax as well, though for a different reason) because of that.  The reader wants to believe that they are like one of the Animorphs because they can relate to at least one of them, not anyone like Estrid.  It's something to be ashamed of when facing your ego.  It makes us angry (and ashamed, I think).

Estrid was a normal civilian and acted accordingly (despite all of her gifts).  Because of her of her genius syndrome she was doubly weak.  She's not a Mary Sue because of that.  I think if KA and her hubby had more time, maybe they would have spent more time fleshing out her character.  Maybe.  We were exposed to five different characters and their backgrounds in a space of about 25.000 words.  But then that could be a plus because she's a well fleshed out character in that small span.  She did what she was supposed to.  Make Ax realize that he, in a way, doesn't fit in with the Andalite world.  He cries.  Andalites don't do that.

I love to hate her because she acted like any other sentient being, and got the love of someone who was the hero every single day.  While Gonrod, the other coward was the one we laughed at because he wasn't challenging the hero.  He was the fool.  While Estrid had a face that we looked into because Ax did.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: yunyun on August 19, 2010, 09:40:27 AM
It's super sad that I saw that and thought of Kat and was really confused as to why a thread had been made about her.....


I think she was a good character. She had some Mary Sue-like qualities, but her genius was not only her asset, it was her downfall. She also suffered from a pretty healthy dose of cowardice. These things, I think, took away her Sueness.
what does mary-sue mean?
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: esplin on August 24, 2010, 09:16:49 AM
It's super sad that I saw that and thought of Kat and was really confused as to why a thread had been made about her.....


I think she was a good character. She had some Mary Sue-like qualities, but her genius was not only her asset, it was her downfall. She also suffered from a pretty healthy dose of cowardice. These things, I think, took away her Sueness.

Sometimes I'm reading a thread and someone has already said it best. 

I will state that I didn't really like the character and I thought Dak Hamee could have done better.. But thats just me.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Chad32 on August 24, 2010, 09:58:15 AM
A Mary Sue is an annoyingly perfect character archetype that can never do wrong and whose actions are always somehow justified.
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: warren_bearclaw on October 12, 2010, 10:16:56 PM
Call me ignorant, but what is a 'Mary Sue'.
I'm all confused...
Title: Re: Estrid: Good, Bad or Mary-Sue
Post by: Chad32 on October 12, 2010, 10:33:46 PM
A Mary Sue is an annoyingly perfect character archetype that can never do wrong and whose actions are always somehow justified.