Author Topic: yeerks and babies  (Read 2458 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline morfowt

  • God
  • ********
  • Posts: 8333
  • Karma: 112
  • Gender: Male
  • this is my avatar. it's a picture of nothing...
yeerks and babies
« on: December 14, 2008, 12:53:06 AM »
ok, so assuming that some yeerk would want a small, defenseless, useless baby for a host, what would it be like for both baby and yeerk? would the baby be able to understand what's happening? would the yeerk get less resistance? what do you think?

Offline wolfev

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 390
  • Karma: 53
  • Gender: Male
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2008, 02:25:05 AM »
Actually a baby would be able to fight back better. Its a pure raw mind of desire. Babies are more egotistical than the yeerks. It wants things and doesn't like being told no. The baby would crush the yeerk's mind.
[img width= height= alt=" border="0]https://vspace.vassar.edu/evwaldron/warriors/banner2.jpg[/img]

Offline OrcaMorph

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 404
  • Karma: 10
  • Gender: Male
    • Transient Resident
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2008, 02:38:55 AM »
Wow, no.  That sounds good but that's not what would happen.

The baby would provide no resistance, as it isn't even sapient.

Although ACTUALLY a yeerk couldn't get in at all, because the baby's ear is too small; Visser 3 said cats were too small to infest, and a baby's ear would be smaller.
<OrcaMorph>

Read my blog on RAF: Transient Resident


Coming Soon

Offline goom

  • the underling of underlings
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8927
  • Karma: 690
  • Gender: Male
  • no other distinguishing characteristics.
    • Twitch.TV Streams
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2008, 04:45:09 AM »
i don't think a yeerk would want a baby, but if it did, the baby would grow up thinking that was the way life was.
they'd be totally screwed up once they were freed.

Offline Chad32

  • God
  • ********
  • Posts: 11951
  • Karma: 195
  • Gender: Male
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2008, 09:19:56 AM »
Wolfev was probably joking there, but it's true that babies are selfcentered. However, it would feel that this was how life was when they got older. They wouldn't remember a time when there wasn't a Yeerk in their head.

I don't know about saying a baby isn't sapient. Maybe you mean sentient. Babies become aware of their surroundings at about 28 weeks in the womb.

It's complicated, and I doubt that Yeerks are interested in hosts that can't do much. They aren't satisfied with Gedds, and that includes the adult ones.


Ani-Master 2014!

Offline AcreLorraine

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
  • Karma: 23
    • Acres and acres
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2008, 09:59:46 AM »
You've missed a vital detail I believe.  Even after birth, the brain must still develope.  Some might say that a brain is never developed, but on the whole, the baby brain doesn't have enough time to mature into functionality.  The earliest functional brain would be around 1 or 2 years old.  and even then, the yeerks have developed minds, when combined with the babys, it would imprint.  creating a human copy of the yeerk.  But I'm just guessing.
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.

It is a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations.

Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result.
 Winston Churchill 

Fanservice?  What fanservice?  This is author service, I don't care if the fans like it or not.

Offline Chad32

  • God
  • ********
  • Posts: 11951
  • Karma: 195
  • Gender: Male
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2008, 10:02:41 AM »
No, the neocortext, which is required for a baby to be aware of its surroundings, develops at 28 weeks. After that, the child is developed enough to function and react bast basic reflex. Like when my sister had a sonograph, and my niece tried to hide from it and avoid it. This has been discussed in many abortion threads on another board I go to.

You must be thinking about a certain level of functionality, as opposed to just being functional. Both of my nieces were pretty functional before they hit one year.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2008, 10:05:20 AM by Nohensen »


Ani-Master 2014!

Offline Myitt

  • Mangiatore dei gatti -- RAFcapella
  • Gold Donor
  • *********
  • Posts: 10449
  • Karma: 487
  • Gender: Female
  • Don't you mean extinct...?
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #7 on: December 14, 2008, 10:27:05 AM »
I think it mentions in #41, the crazy future vision book, that the Yeerks raise children in those warehouse things until they're old enough to be infested--maybe five or six years old?  Maybe older?  I don't think it'd be possible without hurting or killing the baby and the Yeerk.  But assuming it could be possible, I think a baby would be unresistant just because it probably hasn't become aware of itself as being able to fight against this thing for control.  A baby's still trying to get a sense of what it can do, and now all of a sudden someone else comes along and does everything for it?  Sounds like what babies do, even without an alien involved. 



"Screw drugs.  Smoke RAF." - Ash

Offline Shock

  • Xtreme Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 4105
  • Karma: 188
  • Attitudes are contagious. Mine might kill you.
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2008, 01:55:25 PM »
it would be pointless for a yeerk to infest a baby.

babies (by their nature) are totally helpless when it comes to the outside world and are dependant on a parnet to give them their needs (and thus is the reason why babies scream so loud).

Cannibals are seriously messed up
Quote
[17:05:27] Reiyn: Shock's tact and diplomacy is unparalleled.
Beware of he who would deny you access to information. For in his heart, he dreams himself your master
Quote from: K.A. Applegate
So sorry to get you into writing. What a horrible thing to inflict on you. Should have just sold you crack.

Offline wolfev

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 390
  • Karma: 53
  • Gender: Male
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #9 on: December 14, 2008, 05:17:22 PM »
yea but the yeerks could super steroid jack up their bodies with alien tech
[img width= height= alt=" border="0]https://vspace.vassar.edu/evwaldron/warriors/banner2.jpg[/img]

Offline Chad32

  • God
  • ********
  • Posts: 11951
  • Karma: 195
  • Gender: Male
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #10 on: December 14, 2008, 06:24:42 PM »
There's no need to do that.


Ani-Master 2014!

Offline wolfev

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 390
  • Karma: 53
  • Gender: Male
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #11 on: December 14, 2008, 06:26:43 PM »
That can be said for about half the stuff the yeerks do
[img width= height= alt=" border="0]https://vspace.vassar.edu/evwaldron/warriors/banner2.jpg[/img]

Offline Chad32

  • God
  • ********
  • Posts: 11951
  • Karma: 195
  • Gender: Male
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #12 on: December 14, 2008, 06:29:20 PM »
Very very true that, man. Why take involuntaries, when you can engineer nonsentiant brains to be accessable. There's also some obvious brainwashing going on, to ensure Yeerks continue thinking that other lifeforms are beneath them.


Ani-Master 2014!

Offline morfowt

  • God
  • ********
  • Posts: 8333
  • Karma: 112
  • Gender: Male
  • this is my avatar. it's a picture of nothing...
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #13 on: December 15, 2008, 05:20:24 AM »
I doubt that Yeerks are interested in hosts that can't do much. They aren't satisfied with Gedds, and that includes the adult ones.
it would be pointless for a yeerk to infest a baby.

babies (by their nature) are totally helpless when it comes to the outside world and are dependant on a parnet to give them their needs (and thus is the reason why babies scream so loud).

ok, so assuming that some yeerk would want a small, defenseless, useless baby for a host, what would it be like for both baby and yeerk? would the baby be able to understand what's happening? would the yeerk get less resistance? what do you think?

Offline Azguard

  • God
  • ********
  • Posts: 7808
  • Karma: 219
  • Gender: Male
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #14 on: December 15, 2008, 10:47:15 AM »
ok ok.

If a Yeerk did infest a baby, and assuming, let's just say, the baby has basic functions, like walking and such. The baby would absorb some of the Yeerk's thoughts as it grew, but would the baby learn faster? I mean, having an intelligent being inside of you?
RAFcrushin on Tyler. Come on, isn't everyone?

Offline Phoenix004

  • RAF Ancient
  • Sr. Staff
  • *****
  • Posts: 20492
  • Karma: 710
  • Gender: Male
  • With great RAFpower comes great RAFsponsibility...
Re: yeerks and babies
« Reply #15 on: December 15, 2008, 08:36:44 PM »
Wow, no.  That sounds good but that's not what would happen.

The baby would provide no resistance, as it isn't even sapient.

Although ACTUALLY a yeerk couldn't get in at all, because the baby's ear is too small; Visser 3 said cats were too small to infest, and a baby's ear would be smaller.

Very good points. It is possible that a baby's ear would be too small to get inside, but even if a Yeerk could get in then it would not encounter a strong mind. As far as scientists can tell, babies don't become completely self aware until about 2 years of age I believe. A baby's brain is also significantly smaller than that of a fully grown adult.
Animorphs Travels #1 The Invasion
http://animorphsforum.com/index.php?topic=10876.msg860745#msg860745

RAFcon 2015: It's always Hot Dog Day somewhere!